The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the very best experience. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. However, if you would like to, you can read about the cookies we use and change your cookie settings now or at any time using the Policy and cookies link at the top right of this page.
The analysis principle provides support for decision-making for any form of quantitative estimates or calculations, in which the input is uncertain and where those in positions of responsibility need to know the mean value and uncertainty of the result with the highest possible degree of reliability.
The Principle has proved to be particularly useful in the very early stages of a project, idea phases, authorisation and equivalent phases as well as in tendering and contract negotiation scenarios.
It supports optimization of plans and profitability. The Principle is also used to bolster teambuilding, communication and consensus between the different parties involved and to solve problems with overloading.
A range of practical procedures has been developed for estimating costs, project duration, Net Present Value calculations, etc. The Principle has been used in nearly all public and private social spheres. It is particularly appropriate before major decisions have to be made, e.g. on invitations to tender, firm offers and the start-up of major projects, the choice between various alternative proposals, impact audits of new strategies, etc.
The system operates both on an ad hoc basis and by implementing relevant procedures in the organisation in order to solve the following tasks, among others:
The Successive Principle has been used in most public and private spheres. A few examples follow.
Companies have drastically improved their competitiveness
Determining the potential commercial profit of strategic plans, programmes or projects
Safeguarding deadlines, accelerating schedules
Risk analysis for proactive optimisation
Clarifying and ranking ‘give-and-take’ possibilities before and during important contract negotiations
This transition is often far from efficient. The principle safeguard a far more efficient transition.
Optimising the conditions for winning project competitions while nevertheless without sacrificing profit
Facilitating start-up, team building and consensus
Improving the net benefit of a multi-project or portfolio situation, through systematic re-ranking
Analysing optimal strategies for a public body undergoing privatisation
Profitability and risk analysis in building development projects, Build-Operate-Transfer ventures etc.
Commercial and social cost/benefit analyses
Improving the quality and consistency of budgeting in organisations
Identifying long-range potentials and threats for private concerns or companies
Determining the genuine net asset value of going concerns
Stabilising budgets for infrastructure projects and other large projects
Verifying and optimising tender prices before tendering
Evaluating the social as well as the commercial impact of a proactive environmental strategy
About Dr. Steen Lichtenberg